« September 2006 | Main | November 2006 »
News in the KinderStart.com-case (see Techdirt).
This site may be not worth for a high ranking (or any ranking, frankly I don't know this site).
But I think it's in any case not good that one company has the power to throw another company nearly out of business without any need for explanation.
Or do we just have to trust Google because it's the Good and not the Evil?
(See also The Trial on Wikipedia)
Ray Ozzie is quite skeptical about web office applications (see Dan Farber).
After paying people money to rename their IM names as brands (see Techdirt) the marketing folks should lift this great idea to the next step.
After George Bush has outet himself as a geek (see yesterdays post) he may now be interested in questions like net neutrality (see Russell Shaws ZDNet post).
George Bush is a 2.0-geek (see Bush says he uses “the Google.”) and Nicholas Carr thinks umpteenth about wikipedia and the wisdom of the crowds.
Until recent I thought Web 2.0 follows some principles (more or less) but I didn't know that it has an ethic (see Lawrence Lessig and a great comment from Nicholas Carr).
No one knows the questions we blogger will have to answer at the end of our days.
(But this is no unique selling point for us bloggers. The same is true for the fly fishermen and the stamp-collectors.)
Dana Gardner has made some good thougths about ethic and responsibility.
In a recent Gillmor Gang (Backward Gang, last part, which is - for reasons I don't know - part I, btw. the best episode I've heard yet) Dana Gardner and Jason Calacanis had a great discussion about this topic.
(Last Judgement part 1 can be seen here)
After these amazing numbers Google has just announced (see Donna Bogatin at ZDNet) and the power Google shows (see also Donna Bogatin) we all have the hope that we are not longer obliged to memorize those billions of Web-2.0-company. One seems to be enough.
(This is the third part of the implicit series "Web 2.0 Made Easy". See also The New VC Process and Pricing 2.0)
