New Home of Geek&Poke
Geek & Poke has a new home. I would be pleased if you'd follow me there. (This site will be sunset soon)
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
« The Internet Of Things | Main | Zeno's Paradox »
March 15, 2012
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341d3df553ef0168e8d68882970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Static Typing:
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
Very sad that people identify this with static typing. A better image for static typing would be a machine sorting identical eggs into chicken and duck eggs.
Posted by: Daniel Sobral | March 16, 2012 at 02:42 AM
Hey, this one is nice.
I'm smiling as I see the comic.
It's creating an object. Factory way. Nice one.
(http://codedincantation.com/blog/)
Posted by: codedincantation.com | March 16, 2012 at 03:21 AM
simply explained
Posted by: openyourtypepad | March 16, 2012 at 06:39 AM
This is not static typing. This is a lack of type inference.
Posted by: folone | March 16, 2012 at 11:01 AM
NOOOOOO, that's duck typing! :)
Posted by: equivoc | March 16, 2012 at 01:11 PM
Duck duckDuck = duck.goose()
Posted by: H. Howe | March 16, 2012 at 04:35 PM
What you want to criticize is languages with lame type systems (such as Java, C#), and not static typing. Here is how Haskell would look:
d = Duck "Donald"
Posted by: missingfaktor | March 16, 2012 at 08:50 PM